*Says ex-Kogi Gov has lost immunity against arrest
Legal luminary and human rights activist, Mr Femi Falana (SAN), has disclosed that no court in Nigeria can prevent the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from prosecuting former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, following his alleged involvement in N84billion theft.
Citing section 35(1) (c) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) to buttress his point, Falana insisted that the police, anti-graft agencies and other prosecutorial bodies cannot be prevented by a court of law from arresting a criminal suspect once there is reasonable suspicion that he or she has committed a criminal offence.
Falana stated this in a statement he personally signed and made available to TheIdeal News on Wednesday.
According to the Senior Advocate, the allegation by ex-Governor Bello that the EFCC. has disobeyed a court order by attempting to arrest him to answer the charge of N84 billion theft is legally untenable.
Falana further argued that since ex-Governor Bello had lost his immunity from arrest and prosecution, no court can confer a life immunity on him.
Falana further cited landmark judgements of the Supreme Court which held that lower court lacked the power to prevent the arrest of suspects in a criminal matter.
He said, “The Supreme Court had pointed out that the order of a High Court to the effect that a criminal suspect should not be arrested cannot bar a court of coordinate jurisdiction from trying him.
“ In the case of Orji Kalu v Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016) 39 WRN 53, the Appellant challenged the EFCC for charging him before the Federal High Court in spite of the order of the High Court of Abia State restraining the anti graft agency from violating his fundamental right to personal liberty.
“In dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court said that the “gagging order” should not be allowed to stand and that “The suit of the Appellant at Abia State High Court and the general and ambiguous order made therein were clearly intended to ‘muzzle’ or prevent the 1st Respondent from discharging its statutory function.
“Similarly, in Uwazuruike v AGF (2013) 10 NWLR (Pt. 1361) 105, (2013) LPELR-20392 (SC) the Supreme Court ruled that “The Orders of an Owerri Federal High Court made on the 18th of January 2005 restraining the named respondents from arresting Ralph Uwazuruike relates to the proceeding before the Owerri Federal High Court which were ongoing at the time the Orders were made ex-prate. The orders are in no way related, nor do they affect or stop a subsequent arraignment of Ralph Uwazuruike for treason etc.”
Falana further urged the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, to withdraw the police officers who prevented EFCC from arresting Bello, saying that the errant police officers should be charged for obstructing course of justice.
He said, “In view of the foregoing, the police officers who prevented the EFCC from arresting the suspect have committed a grave criminal offence. The Inspector-General of Police, Dr. Kayode Egbetokun should withdraw the said police officers from the private residence of Mr. Bello without any delay and have them charged for obstruction of justice”.
, has disclosed that no court in Nigeria can prevent the Economic and){kind=link}